The main points of this story is there trying to come across the point that editing a photo is not okay. Especially by the person that took the photograph, That editing a photo can make the photograph look like something its really not because its only what your eyes see. There was a lesson learned by editing photographs that were not meant to be edited. Therefore the photographer doesn't like that and neither does the eyes of the viewers or the news reporters. There was consequences due to editing a photo that wasn't yours. 

This type of photo editing is unethical because there was a photograph shown with Isreali prime Minister Benjamin and President Shimon Peres and the members of the government pose for an official photograph in Jerusalem and the next photograph shows the removed female minister Limor Livnat removed from the official photo. I think this not okay and unethical. There was a photograph were is was acceptable where Oil technician Bob Newton appears to have double hands but is not very noticeable and the pipe appears to have a double distortion. This not noticeable at all so its acceptable. 

This photo is selected because its unethical because Bill Clinton and Fidel Castro did meet in New York, but no photographer was there to take this photograph so due to this the Daily News just faked and made up this photo.

This photo is selected because I feel that it was the most least unethical because without knowing the truth you would have never guessed that really wasn't Oprahs body. TV Guide just put Oprah's head onto Ann Margaret's body this is least unethical because its not noticeable at all. If you were to view this article you wouldn't think much of it, This is not as bad as others because its not noctible and no one would really care.